CSK Denies Request for Rule Change in IPL Player Retention

In the latest twist in the saga of IPL player retention rules, Chennai Super Kings (CSK) have publicly denied any involvement in pushing for the reinstatement of an old IPL rule that would classify players retired from international cricket for over five years as uncapped. This rule, which existed until 2021, could potentially allow teams to retain players like MS Dhoni at a significantly lower cost, given his retirement from international cricket in August 2019.

The Rule in Question

The rule in question was part of the IPL’s framework from its inception in 2008 until 2021. It allowed franchises to treat players who had been retired from international cricket for five or more years as uncapped, thereby reducing their retention cost. This move was seen as a strategic advantage for teams looking to retain their legendary players without breaking the bank.

CSK’s Statement

Recent posts on X (formerly known as Twitter) from various sources, including CSK’s CEO, have clarified that CSK did not request this rule change. Instead, the BCCI itself brought up the possibility of reinstating the rule during discussions, suggesting an internal review rather than a franchise-driven initiative. This clarification comes amidst speculation and reports suggesting CSK’s interest in retaining Dhoni under this rule for the IPL 2025 season.

Franchise and BCCI Dynamics

The sentiment across other IPL franchises has been mixed. While some see the potential in retaining their retired stars at a lower cost, others, like Sunrisers Hyderabad’s Kavya Maran, have expressed opposition, arguing that such a classification could be disrespectful to the players’ legacy and market value. This opposition highlights a broader debate on how retired players should be valued in the IPL’s economic model.

The Future of Dhoni and IPL Rules

MS Dhoni, who has been a pivotal figure for CSK, has himself indicated that his participation in IPL 2025 would depend on the finalization of these retention rules. His statement reflects a cautious approach, waiting for clarity on how the rules might affect team strategy and player retention costs.