Listen to this article

The Eden Gardens pitch curation for the IPL 2025 season has become a topic of intense debate following comments made by Sujan Mukherjee, the ground’s curator. Mukherjee recently responded to criticism about his management of the pitch and clarifications regarding the role of franchises in pitch preparation.

Mukherjee initially made a statement implying that franchises do not have influence over the pitch conditions at Eden Gardens. This claim attracted criticism, leading him to retract his comments. However, he later clarified that he did not receive any formal pitch requests from the Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) for their match against the Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB).

In discussing the pitch’s characteristics, Mukherjee emphasized that he aimed to create a surface beneficial for both batting and playing spin, aligning with guidance provided to a coach. He noted that the pitch was prepared according to Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) guidelines and insisted that he did not deny any requests from KKR.

Ajinkya Rahane, associated with the IPL, expressed a preference for a pitch offering some turn, which Mukherjee suggested was taken into consideration. During the match, RCB spinners capitalized on the pitch conditions, achieving more success compared to KKR’s spin attack.

Krunal Pandya of RCB notably took three wickets, while his counterpart from KKR, Suyash Sharma, successfully bowled out Andre Russell. This performance underlined the effective use of spin by RCB spinners during the match.

Mukherjee’s statements have been perceived as inconsistent, especially concerning the alleged influence of franchises on pitch conditions. He reiterated that IPL rules do not account for any formal input from franchises about pitch preparation.

The ongoing debate about the Eden Gardens pitch serves to highlight the complexities involved in balancing competitive fairness with player and team preferences within the IPL framework.

Share this post!